Drawing for JAGA MOTORS

USPTO serial 85286601

JAGA MOTORS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PARK, JENNY K
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JAGA MOTORS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Amy Wright

AMY WRIGHT TAFT STETTINIUS HOLLISTER LLP1 INDIANA SQ STE 3500INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204 2023UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
039Furniture moving; Shipping and delivery services, namely, pickup, transportation, and delivery of packages and letters by various modes of transportation; Shipping of goods; Truck hauling; Truck transport; Trucking services, namely, hauling of furniture and household goods; Warehousing services, namely, storage, distribution, pick-up, packing, and shipping of furniture and household goods; all of the foregoing excluding vehiclesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 24, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 24, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 23, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 19, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 19, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 19, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 22, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 9, 2012TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Dec 9, 2012OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Dec 9, 2012OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Aug 6, 2012OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Mar 6, 2012ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Feb 7, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 7, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 18, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 31, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 23, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 23, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 23, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 15, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 9, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 9, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 9, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 9, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 12, 2011MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Apr 9, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 8, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance