Drawing for NEEBO

USPTO serial 85286876

NEEBO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
YONTEF, DAVID ERIC
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 118- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with NEEBO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cheryl L. Burbach

CHERYL L. BURBACH HOVEY WILLIAMS LLP10801 MASTIN BLVD STE 1000OVERLAND PARK, KS 66210-1697UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Issuing prepaid stored value cards through handheld electronic devices comprised of scanners and computers from remote locations for purchasing used textbooks and digital mediaACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 25, 2019ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jul 1, 2015ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 17, 2015ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 2, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 2, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 26, 2014ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Nov 19, 2014ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 4, 2014GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Sep 4, 2014GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 4, 2014CNFRSU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 4, 2014XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 4, 2014GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 4, 2014GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 4, 2014SNEASU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN—
Sep 4, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 4, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 3, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 18, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 18, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 11, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 11, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 11, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 11, 2014CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 18, 2014SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 27, 2014IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jan 27, 2014EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Aug 24, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 23, 2013EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 23, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 24, 2013EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 24, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 19, 2013ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 13, 2013ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 15, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 14, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 11, 2013EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 11, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 8, 2012ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Aug 8, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 7, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 1, 2012ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jul 26, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 26, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 4, 2012ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 16, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 16, 2012NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Feb 15, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 15, 2012DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 1, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 26, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 26, 2012DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jan 26, 2012ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jan 26, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 26, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 26, 2011NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 31, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 11, 2011NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 26, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 22, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 21, 2011CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 20, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 20, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 20, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 18, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 8, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 8, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance