USPTO serial 85287328
TANTUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EISINGER, REBECCA MILES
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TANTUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Cheyenne, WY
Cheyenne, WY
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Administration of employee benefit plans in the field of insurance and finance; Administration of employee welfare benefit plans in the field of insurance and finance; Cash replacement rendered by credit card; Charitable fund raising services, namely, sharing profits from newspaper subscription sales with not-for-profit organizations; Credit and cash card services; Credit card services; Credit card transaction processing services; Credit card verification; Debit account services featuring debit card and employee benefit related services; Debit card services; Discount securities brokerage services; Electronic commerce payment services, namely, establishing funded accounts used to purchase goods and services on the Internet; Electronic credit card transactions; Financial services in the nature of an investment security; Pre-paid purchase card services namely, processing electronic payments made through prepaid cards; Pre-paid purchase card services, namely, processing electronic payments through pre-paid cards; Providing rebates at participating establishments of others through use of a membership card | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 3, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 22, 2013 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Mar 1, 2013 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Feb 22, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 14, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 2, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2013 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 2, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 3, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 1, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2012 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Aug 9, 2012 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 6, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 15, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 30, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 12, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 11, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 13, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |