USPTO serial 85287513
FROM BRIGHT TO BRILLIANT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4541379Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 3, 2014
- Examiner
- SMITH, REBECCA A
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FROM BRIGHT TO BRILLIANT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Stratford, Ontario, CA
Stratford, Ontario, CA
Stratford, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
D. Peter Hochberg
D. Peter Hochberg Walter | Haverfield LLP1301 East 9th Street, Suite 3500The Tower at ErieviewCLEVELAND, OH 44114-1821Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software, namely, web based application software designed to support collaboration and version control of program source files, executable files, data files and documents by transferring the files and documents to individual users and/or designated servers connected through the Internet and/or the Intranet when the files and documents are maintained in a central database | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Business consulting services in the field of web based events, web based meetings, conferences, training programs, learning programs, and seminars; business consulting services in the field of delivering web-based knowledge, online collaboration and project management | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 038 | Providing online communication web conferencing services via a global computer network or the Internet for the management, collaboration in and sharing of projects, meetings, teams, relationships, ideas, audio, video, text and graphic information and files and to enable work on the aforesaid | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Educational and training services in the field of collaborative decision making, namely, providing online and in-person training in the fields of conducting online meetings, collaboration skills, conducting online events, idea generation skills, decision making methods, action planning skills and distribution of training materials in connection with the aforementioned educational and training services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software and client-server applications for supporting collaboration and version control of program source files, executable files, data files and documents by transferring the files and documents to individual users and/or designated servers connected through the Internet and/or the Intranet when the files and documents are maintained in a central database; providing a website featuring on-line non-downloadable software tools for group decision making, collaboration and action planning, for conducting online meetings and events, and for idea generation; providing a website featuring technology that enables internet users to create and share documents, images, audio and videos | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Powernoodle Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Powernoodle Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Powernoodle Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named FROM BRIGHT TO BRILLIANT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 2021 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 3, 2019 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2014 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 18, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 26, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 10, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 6, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 21, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 18, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 14, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 27, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 27, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 23, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 6, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 7, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 10, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |