Drawing for TRACKATEERING

USPTO serial 85288335

TRACKATEERING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WOOD, CAROLINE
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRACKATEERING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Karl L. Guthrie

KARL L. GUTHRIE THE GUTHRIE LAW FIRM84 GLENDALE AVENUELIVINGSTON, NJ 07039UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Film and television programmingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 10, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 10, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 16, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 15, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 12, 2013NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Jul 10, 2013EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 10, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 10, 2013DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 12, 2013DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jun 12, 2013ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Apr 11, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 10, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 9, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 7, 2013NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Mar 6, 2013TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Mar 6, 2013PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 6, 2013PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 11, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 11, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 10, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 18, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 17, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 15, 2012NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Oct 15, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 13, 2012TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Oct 13, 2012PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 13, 2012PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 13, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 10, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 10, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 15, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 15, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 26, 2011NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 7, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 5, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 22, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 22, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 22, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 22, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 30, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 30, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 30, 2011CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Aug 30, 2011CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Aug 22, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 12, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 12, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 11, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 11, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 11, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 9, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 6, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 12, 2011MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Apr 11, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance