USPTO serial 85290291
VIRTUALSHARP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4328782Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 30, 2013
- Examiner
- BROWN, TINA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with VIRTUALSHARP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Madrid, ES
Madrid, ES
Madrid, ES
BURLINGTON, MA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tuvia Rotberg
TUVIA ROTBERG LEVISOHN BERGER, LLP11 BROADWAY STE 615NEW YORK, NY 10004-1490UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use in business continuity planning and business management, namely, computer software for performing disaster recovery management, data backup management and automated arrangement, coordination, management and monitoring of complex computer systems; computer software for performing remote, online, managed and consolidated disaster recovery systems and data backup management; computer software for use in data managing, securing, tuning, optimizing, replicating, storing, backing up, recovering, restoring, mirroring, disk management, disk cloning, compression, encryption, messaging, networking, virtual application, virtual storage and infrastructure management, and for reporting on computer files and databases; computer software to predict, detect, analyze, diagnose, configure, manage, monitor, optimize, report on and resolve software and data back up performance and availability and security issues; computer software to enable conversions, migrations and safeguarding of data, information and digital files, namely, audio, video, text, binary, still images, graphics and multimedia files, and prevention of virus in the nature of anti-virus software; and data processors and computers for business continuity and disaster recovery systems and backup management, automated arrangement, coordination, management and monitoring of complex computer systems | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 28, 2012 |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, designing and developing computer programs and software; maintaining and installing computer programs and software; and providing technical support services in the nature of troubleshooting and resolving of computer software problems, advice and consultancy relating to computer software and computer disaster recovery | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 28, 2012 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Virtualsharp Software, S.L.U.
- Other trademarks owned by Virtualsharp Software, S.L.U.
- Other trademarks owned by Virtualsharp Software, S.L.U.
- Other trademarks owned by UNITRENDS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named VIRTUALSHARP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2022 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 15, 2020 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 6, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 22, 2019 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 13, 2018 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 30, 2018 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2018 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 30, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 28, 2013 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2013 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 22, 2013 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 6, 2013 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 6, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 21, 2013 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2013 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 18, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 6, 2012 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 14, 2012 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 2, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 13, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 23, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 23, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 7, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 7, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 7, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 13, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 18, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |