Drawing for SAND-N-SUN

USPTO serial 85290685

SAND-N-SUN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BOONE, JOHN C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SAND-N-SUN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Danica Acosta

702 SW 8TH STBENTONVILLE, AR 72716-6209UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Sunglasses; Swimming goggles; Scuba masksACTIVE—
024TowelsACTIVE—
028Toy water guns; Volleyballs; Volleyball nets; Basketballs; Basketball nets; Basketball hoops; Toy play wands; Toy circles for use in pools; Balls for water sports and games; Sand toys, namely, buckets and shovels; Beach balls; Floating toys; Inflatable toys; Inflatable swimming pools; Flippers for swimming; Sand sculpting toys; Arm floats for recreational use; Inflatable inner tubes for aquatic recreational useACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 9, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 8, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 6, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 10, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 10, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 21, 2011NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 3, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 3, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 8, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 8, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 8, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 8, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 8, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 5, 2011GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 5, 2011GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jul 5, 2011CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 24, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 14, 2011MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Apr 13, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 12, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance