Drawing for RECOGNIA TECHNICAL INSIGHT

USPTO serial 85291616

RECOGNIA TECHNICAL INSIGHT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEASER, ANDREW C
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with RECOGNIA TECHNICAL INSIGHT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert P. Lord

ROBERT P. LORD OSHA LIANG, LLP909 FANNIN ST STE 3500HOUSTON, TX 77010UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Financial services, namely, providing financial information regarding daily trading trends and technical analysis of selected stocks via the internet, intranets, and email notification alertsACTIVE—
038Providing email notification alerts in the field of finance via the internet; providing access to databases of educational material on technical analysis of stocksACTIVE—
042Providing on-line software, namely, analysis software for automating the monitoring and analysis of financial data, for database management, and for accessing electronic databases relating to trading trends and educational material on technical analysisACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 5, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 2, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 21, 2012GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 21, 2012GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 21, 2012CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 13, 2012ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 5, 2012PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Feb 18, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 16, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 16, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 16, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 30, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 17, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 29, 2011GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Dec 29, 2011GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Dec 29, 2011EPENCOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION AUTOMATIC ENTRY—
Dec 29, 2011CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Jul 19, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 19, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 19, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 14, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 14, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 14, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance