Drawing for OMNICOIL

USPTO serial 85292592

OMNICOIL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BLAIR, JASON
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OMNICOIL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brian R. McGinley

Brian R. McGinley Dentons US LLPPO BOX 061080Wacker Drive Station, Willis TowerCHICAGO, IL 60606-1080

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Footwear; shoes specially designed for sports; soles; finished linings for shoes; replacement parts for the aforesaid goodsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 9, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 9, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 9, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 8, 2016EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
May 23, 2016EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 23, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 2, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 1, 2015EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 3, 2015EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 3, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 9, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 6, 2015EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 29, 2015EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 29, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 17, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 16, 2015EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 16, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 1, 2014EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 1, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 29, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 27, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 27, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 27, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 3, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 22, 2013ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
May 7, 2013ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 9, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 9, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 8, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 20, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 6, 2013PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 5, 2013CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 2, 2012GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 2, 2012GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 2, 2012CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Sep 19, 2012RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 16, 2012GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 16, 2012GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 16, 2012CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 7, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 7, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 3, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 23, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 23, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 20, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 20, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 22, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 22, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 22, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 18, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 16, 2011MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Apr 15, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 15, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance