Drawing for WHOLESOME FOODS BAKERY

USPTO serial 85296362

WHOLESOME FOODS BAKERY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KERTGATE, AMY L
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WHOLESOME FOODS BAKERY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Debra L. Witter

DEBRA L. WITTER THE WITTER LAW FIRM1700 PACIFIC STE 3700DALLAS, TX 75201UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Bakery goods, namely, gluten-free breads, dinner rolls, sandwich breads, muffins, sweet breads, brownies, cookies, cakes, pastries; gluten-free grain-based food bars also containing seeds, nuts, dried fruits, honey and/or syrup; gluten-free grain-based snack mix also containing seeds, nuts, honey, oil and saltACTIVEApr 1, 2010

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 1, 2012MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jun 1, 2012ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
May 31, 2012EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Feb 17, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 17, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 17, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 25, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 25, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 25, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 27, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 27, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 27, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 21, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 19, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 19, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance