USPTO serial 85296545
SURF JERKY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUTLER, MIDGE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SURF JERKY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leighton K. Chong
LEIGHTON K. CHONG IP & PATENT ATTORNEY133 KAAI STHONOLULU, HI 96821-1545UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Athletic apparel, namely, shirts, pants, jackets, footwear, hats and caps, athletic uniforms; Sports pants; Sports shirts; Sports shirts with short sleeves; Surf wear; Wearable garments and clothing, namely, shirts | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment and education services in the nature of a series of short shows featuring surfing and sports entertainment distributed to mobile handsets, which may include video, text, photos, illustrations or hypertext; Entertainment and educational services, namely, providing a website that displays various requests, reviews, recommendations, rankings, trackings, votes, and information relating to uncreated, unreleased, new, special, popular, and rare products, services, and events in the fields of pop culture, entertainment, education, and sports, all exclusively for non-business and non-commercial transactions and purposes; Entertainment services, namely, providing a web site featuring photographic, video and prose presentations featuring surfing and sports entertainment; Entertainment services, namely, providing information by means of a global computer network in the fields of celebrities, entertainment, and popular culture; Entertainment services, namely, providing on-going television programs in the field of surfing and sports entertainment via a global computer network; Entertainment services, namely, providing on-going webisodes featuring surfing and sports entertainment via a global computer network; Entertainment services, namely, providing on-line, non-downloadable virtual tablet computer applications for use in virtual environments created for entertainment purposes; Entertainment services, namely, providing podcasts in the field of surfing and sports entertainment; Entertainment services, namely, providing video podcasts in the field of surfing and sports entertainment; Entertainment services, namely, providing webcasts in the field of surfing and sports entertainment; Entertainment services, namely, the provision of continuing web videos, webisodes, and podcasts featuring surfing and sports entertainment delivered by web, tablet computers, and mobile devices; Providing a website for entertainment purposes where users can view and post videos and other media content featuring surfing and sports entertainment | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 22, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 20, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 3, 2012 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 19, 2011 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2011 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 5, 2011 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 13, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 11, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 29, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 27, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 21, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 19, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 19, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |