USPTO serial 85296603
NOWARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUTLER, MIDGE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NOWARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John A. Powell
JOHN A. POWELL NAMAN, HOWELL, SMITH & LEE, PLLCPO BOX 1470WACO, TX 76703-1470UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Biodegradable and compostable boxes, cartons, trays, packing wrap, containers, lids, pouches, bags, and packaging for food, beverages, and other consumer products made from materials, namely, bagasse (sugar cane) and corn starch which are substitutes for paper and pulp products; Biodegradable to-go paper food containers; Biodegradable paper disposable one-way containers for foodstuffs; Biodegradable and compostable paper disposable boxes, cartons, trays, cups, plates, containers, lids, pouches and bags for foods and beverages; Packaging and containers comprised of starch-based and bagasse-based materials in the nature of a paper substitute for storage and transport of food, beverages and other consumer products; Packaging and containers comprised of plant fiber based materials in the nature of a paper substitute for food, beverages and consumer products; Packaging and containers for food and beverages comprised of paper materials designed to lessen adverse effects on the environment; Biodegradable paper packaging for the food industry | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Biodegradable packaging, boxes, cartons, trays, containers, lids, films, and wraps for meats, vegetables, cookies, cakes, deli items, and other food and beverage items made from thermoformed biopolymers and bioplastics such as PLA for commercial use | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 10, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 26, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 22, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 11, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2013 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 11, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 11, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 12, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 8, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 13, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 24, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 2, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 4, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2012 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 24, 2012 | PBTQ | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB OTQR REQUEST | — |
| Feb 15, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 15, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 30, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 29, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 27, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 27, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 2011 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 19, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |