USPTO serial 85297248
PIC! SIX!!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4688940Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 17, 2015
- Examiner
- LUDEMAN, JESSICA ANN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PIC! SIX!!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Oshawa, Ontario, CA
Oshawa, Ontario, CA
Oshawa, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Maria Holman
Maria Holman Webster Hudson & Coombe1040 West Georgia Street501Vancouver BC, V6E4H1Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Card games | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 4, 2014 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2021 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 17, 2020 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2015 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 13, 2015 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2015 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 22, 2014 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 24, 2014 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2014 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Nov 4, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 4, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2014 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 6, 2014 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 30, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2014 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 28, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2014 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 27, 2014 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 6, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 6, 2013 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2013 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 3, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 17, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2013 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 15, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2013 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 15, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 15, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 7, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 6, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 20, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 26, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2012 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 26, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 26, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 11, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 8, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 8, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 18, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 15, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 22, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 20, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |