USPTO serial 85299227
HIRS HYBRID IDLE REDUCTION SYSTEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILKE, JOHN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HIRS HYBRID IDLE REDUCTION SYSTEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Canadian Energy Efficiency Alliance
Mississauga, Ontario, CA
Other trademarks owned by Canadian Energy Efficiency Alliance
Canadian Energy Efficiency Alliance
Mississauga, Ontario, CA
Other trademarks owned by Canadian Energy Efficiency Alliance
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Angela R. Gott
ANGELA R. GOTT BENESCH FRIEDLANDER COPLAN & ARONOFF LLP200 PUBLIC SQ STE 2300CLEVELAND, OH 44114-2378UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Automated power control systems, namely, micro-processor based hardware and software used for managing power-consuming devices and power sources in vehicles to reduce the need for engine idling to maintain power to the power-consuming devices in vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Canadian Energy Efficiency Alliance
- Other trademarks owned by Canadian Energy Efficiency Alliance
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named HIRS HYBRID IDLE REDUCTION SYSTEM
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 10, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 9, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 8, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 13, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 22, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 6, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 21, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 20, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 20, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 20, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 1, 2011 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2011 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2011 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 23, 2011 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 22, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |