Drawing for WHYPAK

USPTO serial 85300539

WHYPAK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TWOHIG, SHANNON MARIE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 121

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WHYPAK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennifer Lee Taylor

JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP425 MARKET ST FL 30SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2482UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008Utility belts for carrying tools formed by straps that cross the chest of the wearerACTIVE—
025Clothing, namely, utility belts for carrying wallets, keys, and other personal items formed by straps that cross the chest of the wearerACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 22, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 21, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 19, 2012NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 24, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 4, 2012NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 20, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 16, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 15, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 15, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 15, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 1, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 1, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 9, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 31, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 8, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 1, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 29, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 27, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 26, 2011MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Apr 25, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 23, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance