Drawing for ZO RADICAL PEEL

USPTO serial 85300590

ZO RADICAL PEEL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PERKINS, ELLEN J
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ZO RADICAL PEEL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark A. Williams

Mark A. Williams PARSONAGE VANDENACK WILLIAMS LLC17007 Marcy St., Ste. 3OMAHA, NE 68112UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Anti-aging creams; anti-wrinkle creams; cosmetic creams for skin care; skin toners; skin whitening creamsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 22, 2014MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Dec 22, 2014ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Dec 19, 2014EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jul 3, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 2, 2014EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jun 20, 2014EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jun 20, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 12, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 11, 2014EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 31, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 20, 2013EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 20, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 28, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 21, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 19, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 19, 2013EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 19, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 19, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 17, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 17, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 17, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 14, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 13, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 13, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 18, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 18, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 28, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 28, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 25, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 25, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 18, 2011CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Oct 18, 2011COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Sep 21, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 21, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 8, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 7, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 6, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 6, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 31, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 31, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 31, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 25, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 25, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 23, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance