USPTO serial 85300882
L
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POWELL, LINDA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with L?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Merritt Island, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian S. Steinberger
BRIAN S. STEINBERGER LAW OFFICES OF BRIAN S. STEINBERGER, P.A.101 BREVARD AVECOCOA, FL 32922-7904UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Employment management services, namely, professional staffing services in the fields of IT, healthcare, national security, environment, space, computer systems integration services; Project management for business purposes in the fields of IT, healthcare, national security, environment, space, computer systems integration services; data management, namely, computerized database management, data processing services; policy development for others, namely, public policy research, business development consulting services in the fields of health, environment, space program and project management services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Basic and applied scientific and product research and development, in the fields of IT, healthcare national security, environment, space, computer systems integration services; computer systems engineering services; engineering services in the field of environmental; technical engineering and consulting support services; business and technical support services, namely, developing technologies for others in the fields of software development, information technology, the environment, health care, safety; scientific or product advanced research and development services for others in the fields of health, environment, space, program and project management services; data management, namely, data mining, database development services in the fields of health, environment, space, program and project management services; computer project management; computer program management, namely, computer programming services, design and development of computer programs for others; new product development services for others; testing and design of new products development services for others; testing and design of new products for others in the fields of health, environment, space program and project management services; policy development for others, namely, product development consulting in the fields of health, environment, space program and project management services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 9, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 2, 2011 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 1, 2011 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jul 29, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 2011 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |