Drawing for PTEROSTAR

USPTO serial 85301032

PTEROSTAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FRAZIER, TAMARA G
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PTEROSTAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jaye S. Campbell

Jaye S. Campbell Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP1500 K Street, NWSuite 1100Washington, DC 20005-1209

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Active chemical ingredients for use in the manufacture of dietary supplements, foods, medical foods, beverages, food supplements, cosmetics and botanical drugsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 8, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 8, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 6, 2013CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jun 6, 2013COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
May 29, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 29, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 22, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 21, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 21, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 19, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 19, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 5, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 16, 2012ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 10, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 10, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 21, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 7, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 4, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 22, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 22, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 22, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 22, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 31, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 31, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 20, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 9, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 3, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 3, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 3, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 29, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 26, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 25, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance