Drawing for WYSE CLOUD CONFIGURATION

USPTO serial 85302112

WYSE CLOUD CONFIGURATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ORNDORFF, LINDA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WYSE CLOUD CONFIGURATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lynne M.J. Boisineau

LYNNE M.J. BOISINEAU MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP18191 VON KARMAN AVE STE 500IRVINE, CA 92612-7108UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware, computer software and virtual machines for allowing interaction between multiple processing devices, namely, accessing, processing, translating, and communicating information between multiple processing devices, namely, data centers, telephones, mobile telephones, personal digital assistants, smartphones, computers, laptop computers, handheld computers, server devices, portable computerized devices, namely, multimedia devices, namely, portable media players, audio devices, video devicesACTIVE—
042Computer services, namely, acting as an application service provider in the field of online computer software for allowing interaction between multiple processing devices, namely, accessing, processing, translating, and communicating information between multiple processing devices, namely, data centers, telephones, mobile telephones, personal digital assistants, smartphones, computers, laptop computers, handheld computers, server devices, portable computerized devices, namely, multimedia devices, namely, portable media players, audio devices, video devicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 17, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 17, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 16, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 14, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 14, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 14, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 15, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 20, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 20, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 17, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 17, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 4, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 4, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 4, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 4, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 4, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 3, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 3, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 3, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 2, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 27, 2011MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Apr 26, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 26, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance