Drawing for HARVEST SHUTTLE

USPTO serial 85302482

HARVEST SHUTTLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HALMEN, KATHERINE E
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HARVEST SHUTTLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

George R. Repper

George R. Repper Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, pc607 14th Street NWSuite 800Washington, DC 20005

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012TRUCK TENDER, NAMELY, A MULTI-WHEELED LAND VEHICLE THAT TRANSPORTS CROPS FROM A HARVESTING MACHINE TO A TRUCKACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 6, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 6, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 18, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jun 17, 2014EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jun 10, 2014EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jun 10, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 22, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jan 21, 2014EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 20, 2013EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 20, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 10, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Sep 9, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 29, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 30, 2013EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 30, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 17, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jan 16, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 19, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 19, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 25, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jul 24, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 20, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 2, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 2, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 28, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 28, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 28, 2012NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 3, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 14, 2011NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 29, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 22, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 2, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 1, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 1, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 1, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 31, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 31, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 1, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 30, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 30, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 9, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 8, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 1, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 27, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 26, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance