Drawing for HYDROCORE

USPTO serial 85303451

HYDROCORE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ENGEL, MICHAEL
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HYDROCORE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Howard N. Aronson

HOWARD N. ARONSON LACKENBACH SIEGEL LLP1 CHASE RDSCARSDALE, NY 10583-4156UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Water filtersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 20, 2012MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Nov 20, 2012ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Nov 19, 2012EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
May 21, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 21, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 21, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 25, 2012ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 2, 2012PBTQWITHDRAWN FROM PUB OTQR REQUEST—
Feb 21, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 21, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 6, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 6, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 6, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 6, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 6, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 6, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 6, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 3, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 29, 2011MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Apr 28, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 28, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance