Drawing for IFBTV

USPTO serial 85303712

IFBTV

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BULLOFF, TOBY ELLEN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 119 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with IFBTV?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark E. Wiemelt

MARK E. WIEMELT LAW OFFICES OF MARK E. WIEMELT, P.C.920 S. KENSINGTON AVE.LAGRANGE, IL 60525UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Computer services, namely, interactive hosting services which allow the user to publish and share their own content and images on-lineACTIVEApr 25, 2011

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 13, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 13, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 6, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 16, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 16, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 16, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 2015RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 12, 2015RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 4, 2014RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 27, 2014RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 15, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 14, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 11, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 7, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 3, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 3, 2011GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 3, 2011GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 3, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 3, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 29, 2011MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Apr 28, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 28, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance