USPTO serial 85303730
MAKE TODAY BETTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FLOWERS, JAY K
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MAKE TODAY BETTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Debra S. Serota
DEBRA S. SEROTA FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.PO BOX 1022MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55440-1022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Dips (excluding salsa and other sauces and Class 30 based dips such as chocolate or caramel used as dips); hummus; cheese spreads; cream cheese; dairy-based spreads; garlic-based spread; spreads; soup; tuna fish salad; chicken salad; vegetable and garden salads; protein salad; chili; breakfast sandwiches; egg soufflés; egg sandwiches; yogurt parfaits; yogurt smoothies; fruit salad; cole slaw; hash brown potatoes; yogurt based dips; combination meals consisting primarily of soup and also including salads, sandwich, dessert and/or beverages; combination meals consisting primarily of vegetable salads and also including, soup, sandwich, dessert and/or beverages; combination meals consisting primarily of egg soufflés and also including breakfast sandwiches, hash browns, pastries, oatmeal, yogurt parfait, bagels, muffins, bread and/or beverages; combination meals consisting primarily of a meat or vegetable-based entrée and a soup, salad, dessert and/or beverage; granola; oatmeal, coffee; coffee based beverages; salad dressings; candy; chocolate bars; candy mints; chewing gum; mixes for making baking batters; refrigerated cookie and brownie dough; bagel chips; croutons; sandwiches; breads; bagels; bakery goods; bakery desserts; pesto; macaroni and cheese; prepared pasta; combination meals consisting primarily of sandwiches and also including soup, salads, dessert and/or beverages; combination meals consisting primarily of breakfast sandwiches and also including hash browns, yogurt parfait, pastries, oatmeal, bagels, soufflés, muffins, bread and/or beverages; combination meals consisting primarily of yogurt parfait and also including breakfast sandwiches, hash browns, pastries, oatmeal, bagels, soufflés, muffins, bread and/or beverages; combination meals consisting primarily of oatmeal and also including breakfast sandwiches, hash browns, pastries, yogurt parfait, bagels, soufflés, muffins, bread and/or beverages; combination meals consisting primarily of pastries and also including breakfast sandwiches, hash browns, yogurt parfait, oatmeal, bagels, soufflés, muffins, bread and/or beverages; combination meals consisting primarily of bagels and also including breakfast sandwiches, hash browns, pastries, oatmeal, yogurt parfait, soufflés, muffins, bread and/or beverages; combination meals consisting primarily of hot sandwiches with soup and salad; combination meals consisting primarily of cold sandwiches with soup and salad; combination meals consisting primarily of hot sandwiches and cold sandwiches with soup or salad; catering services; providing food, namely, restaurant and bakery services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 6, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 22, 2011 | IIOA | INADVERTENTLY ISSUED OFFICE ACTION | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 6, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 2, 2011 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 31, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 26, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 25, 2011 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2011 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |