USPTO serial 85303822
PLYVERSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROACH, APRIL K
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PLYVERSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David C Bouza
114 Mark Twain Dr.Apt. 14River Ridge, LA 70123Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 2013 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Sep 18, 2013 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2013 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 23, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 5, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2013 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 29, 2013 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jul 29, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 16, 2013 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2013 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 23, 2013 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 22, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 2, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 31, 2012 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 18, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 26, 2012 | INCE | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Sep 21, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 21, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 17, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2012 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 24, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 4, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 19, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 5, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 14, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 10, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 3, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |