USPTO serial 85304120
Serial No. 85304120
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MORENO, PAUL A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 85304120?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Paisley, Renfrewshire, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard Y. Kim
RICHARD Y. KIM MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP500 N CAPITOL ST NW FL 4WASHINGTON, DC 20001-1531UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Alcoholic beverages excluding beers; spirits; distilled spirits; whisky; whisky liqueurs; alcoholic beverages from or containing whisky | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 27, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 29, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 27, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 5, 2014 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2014 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 27, 2014 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 27, 2014 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2014 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 7, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 9, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 9, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 2, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 10, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 10, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 26, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 23, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 22, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 1, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 13, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 2011 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |