Drawing for LIV RESTO-LOUNGE

USPTO serial 85304124

LIV RESTO-LOUNGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HETZEL, DANNEAN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with LIV RESTO-LOUNGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043Bar and cocktail lounge services; Bar and restaurant services; Cocktail lounge services; Cocktail lounges; Restaurant and bar services; Restaurant and bar services, including restaurant carryout servicesACTIVEApr 20, 2011

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 9, 2015UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Dec 5, 2014MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 5, 2014ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 8, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 8, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 8, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 14, 2014RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 8, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 1, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 27, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 27, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 27, 2012GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 27, 2012GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 27, 2012CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 7, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 7, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 28, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 10, 2012ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Feb 10, 2012GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 10, 2012GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 10, 2012CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 2, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 2, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 2, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 4, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 4, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 4, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 4, 2011RFTPREMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS—
Aug 2, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 30, 2011MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Apr 29, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 28, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance