USPTO serial 85304161
TUFFDISK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RINKER, ANTHONY MICHAEL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TUFFDISK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thinh V. Nguyen
THINH V. NGUYEN BLAKELY SOKOLOFF TAYLOR ZAFMAN12400 WILSHIRE BLVD FL 7LOS ANGELES, CA 90025-1019UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic, electrical, and electro-magnetic devices, namely, micro-circuits, micro-chips; integrated circuits; storage devices, namely, hard disk drives, optical disk drives, magnetic tape drives, electronic circuit cards, flash memory cards, solid state drives; data storage computer chips; semiconductor devices, data storage and memory modules, namely, flash memory data storage cards, data storage hard disk drives, data storage memory expansion modules, memory cards, memory expansion modules, flash memory cards, solid state drives, advanced technology attachment (ATA) hard disk drives, serial ATA hard disk drives, peripheral component interconnect (PCI) hardware, universal serial bus (USB) flash drives, static random access cards, dynamic random access memory (RAM) cards, double data rate synchronous dynamic RAM cards; data storage systems, namely, flash memory data storage cards, data storage hard disk drives, data storage memory expansion modules, memory cards, memory expansion modules, flash memory cards, solid state drives, advanced technology attachment (ATA) hard disk drives, serial ATA hard disk drives, peripheral component interconnect (PCI) hardware, universal serial bus (USB) flash drives, static random access cards, dynamic random access memory (RAM) cards, double data rate synchronous dynamic RAM cards; embedded systems, namely, flash memory data storage cards, data storage hard disk drives, data storage memory expansion modules, memory cards, memory expansion modules, flash memory cards, solid state drives, advanced technology attachment (ATA) hard disk drives, serial ATA hard disk drives, peripheral component interconnect (PCI) hardware, universal serial bus (USB) flash drives, static random access cards, dynamic random access memory (RAM) cards, double data rate synchronous dynamic RAM cards; hardware circuits and devices for use in data storage and storage management, namely, flash memory data storage cards, data storage hard disk drives, data storage memory expansion modules, memory cards, memory expansion modules, flash memory cards, solid state drives, advanced technology attachment (ATA) hard disk drives, serial ATA hard disk drives, peripheral component interconnect (PCI) hardware, universal serial bus (USB) flash drives, static random access cards, dynamic random access memory (RAM) cards, double data rate synchronous dynamic RAM cards; software for use in data storage and storage management and printed data sheets, application notes, and users manuals all supplied therewith as a unit | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 25, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 25, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 23, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 26, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 6, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 15, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 2, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 2, 2013 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 2, 2013 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2013 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2013 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 29, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 29, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 29, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 7, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 4, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 4, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 6, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 9, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 29, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |