Drawing for RAW SPORT

USPTO serial 85304683

RAW SPORT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SPARACINO, MARK V
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RAW SPORT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Adam E. Schwartz

ADAM E. SCHWARTZ SCHWARTZ INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW, PLLC244 5TH AVE # 2157NEW YORK, NY 10001-7604UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Fruit-based raw food bars; raw nut and seed-based food bars; vegetable-based raw food bars; fruit- and nut-based raw food barsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 14, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 14, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 14, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 13, 2015EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Feb 17, 2015EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Feb 17, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 20, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 19, 2014EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 15, 2014NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Aug 15, 2014TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Aug 15, 2014PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 15, 2014PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 14, 2014EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Feb 26, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 25, 2014EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 14, 2014EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 14, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 21, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 20, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 12, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 12, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 7, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 6, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 5, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 16, 2013NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Feb 15, 2013TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Feb 15, 2013PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 15, 2013PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 14, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 14, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 19, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 19, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 30, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 16, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 16, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 2, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 2, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 2, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 2, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 2, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 13, 2012NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Apr 12, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 12, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 12, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 12, 2012PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 12, 2012PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 7, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 7, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 10, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 10, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 10, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 4, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 30, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 29, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance