Drawing for CODE

USPTO serial 85304738

CODE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MEIER, SHARON A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CODE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Morland C. Fischer

MORLAND C. FISCHER LAW OFFICES OF MORLAND C. FISCHER2030 MAIN ST STE 1300IRVINE, CA 92614-7220UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Protective sports helmets and gogglesACTIVE
028Protective face masks for paintball and air softACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 1, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 1, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 23, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Feb 22, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Feb 15, 2013NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED
Feb 15, 2013TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION
Feb 15, 2013PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Feb 15, 2013PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Dec 31, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 31, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 29, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
May 25, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
May 24, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
May 24, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
May 9, 2012ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
May 3, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
May 3, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 28, 2012ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Nov 29, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 4, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Oct 4, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Oct 4, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 1, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Aug 31, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 18, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 15, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 15, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 15, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 10, 2011GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 10, 2011GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 10, 2011CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 4, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 30, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Apr 29, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance