Drawing for EVA'S KITCHEN

USPTO serial 85305540

EVA'S KITCHEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TRUSILO, KELLY JEAN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with EVA'S KITCHEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen J. Strauss

STEPHEN J STRAUSS FULWIDER PATTON LLP6060 CENTER DR FL 10LOS ANGELES, CA 90045-1598UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES IN THE NATURE OF ON-GOING TELEVISION PROGRAMS IN THE FIELD OF COOKING, FOOD, RESTAURANTS AND ENTERTAINING; ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES IN THE NATURE OF TELEVISION PROGRAMS IN THE REALITY GENRE AND IN THE FIELD OF COOKING AND RESTAURANTS; EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, CONDUCTING ENTERTAINMENT SEMINARS, CONFERENCES, WORKSHOPS, RETREATS, COURSES, CAMPS, HOLIDAYS IN THE FIELD OF COOKING AND RESTAURANTS; PUBLISHING, NAMELY, PUBLICATION OF MAGAZINES, BROCHURES, GUIDES AND BOOKS; ORGANIZING, CONDUCTING AND PRESENTING CONCERTS, COURSES, CONFERENCES, DEMONSTRATIONS, AND WORKSHOPS FOR EDUCATIONAL, CULTURAL OR ENTERTAINMENT PURPOSES IN THE FIELD OF COOKING OR RESTAURANTS; ORGANIZATION, PRODUCTION, AND PRESENTATION OF COMPETITIONS, CONTESTS, AND LIVE EXHIBITIONS IN THE FIELD OF REALITY SHOWS, COOKING AND RESTAURANTS, ROAD SHOWS IN THE FIELD OF REALITY SHOWS, COOKING AND RESTAURANTS, RAVES, AND CONCERTS; PRODUCTION AND DISTRIBUTION OF MOTION PICTURES AND TELEVISION SHOWS; MULTIMEDIA PRODUCTION SERVICESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 6, 2014MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 6, 2014ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 4, 2014EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 15, 2013EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Aug 2, 2012EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 2, 2012EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 22, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 22, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 12, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 11, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 11, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 11, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 8, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 5, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 10, 2011AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Jun 3, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 1, 2011PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
May 2, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 30, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance