USPTO serial 85305692
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas A. Miro
DOUGLAS A MIRO OSTROLENK FABER LLP1180 AVENUE OF THE AMERICASFLOOR 7NEW YORK, NY 10036-8443| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Medical laboratory services; medical testing services for medical research purposes | ACTIVE | Mar 12, 1985 |
| 044 | Hospital services and hospital-based medical services, namely, health care services, namely, clinical services, physician services, dentistry services, medical testing services for diagnostic or treatment purposes, nursing care services; medical counseling; health care consulting services in the field of treating diseases, medical, physical rehabilitation and physical therapy services, providing health information, providing medical information, consultancy and advisory services; providing a web site featuring medical information | ACTIVE | Mar 12, 1985 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 2013 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 15, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 2013 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 9, 2013 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 18, 2013 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Dec 13, 2012 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2012 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 12, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 11, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 11, 2012 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 13, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 12, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 22, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 3, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 15, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 3, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |