USPTO serial 85305954
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
BIY Build It Yourself Renovation Learning Center Inc.
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Other trademarks owned by BIY Build It Yourself Renovation Learning Center Inc.
BIY Build It Yourself Renovation Learning Center Inc.
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Other trademarks owned by BIY Build It Yourself Renovation Learning Center Inc.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lori K. Hall
LORI K. HALL GOWLING LAFLEUR HENDERSON LLP1 MAIN ST WHAMILTON, ONTARIO, L8P4Z5CANADA| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Education and training services, namely, organizing, presenting, conducting, providing and staging conferences, training sessions, seminars, courses, workshops and conventions in the field of home improvement and renovation, home design, building maintenance, architecture, heating and ventilating, electrical, tiling, building construction, construction of residential buildings; Education and training services, namely, organizing, presenting, conducting, providing and staging conferences, training sessions, seminars, courses, workshops and conventions in the field of home improvement and renovation, home design, building maintenance, architecture, heating and ventilating, electrical, tiling, building construction, construction of residential buildings, and distribution of printed educational publications in connection therewith; publishing services for publications of an educational training nature, namely, conference, seminar, course, workshop and convention materials; Educational services, namely, providing online classes, seminars and workshops in the field of project planning assistance, home improvement and renovation, home design, building maintenance, architecture, heating and ventilating, electrical, tiling, building construction, construction of residential buildings; Providing a website featuring blogs and non-downloadable publications in the nature of articles on topics of general interest regarding home improvement and renovations; Providing a web site where users can post ratings, reviews and recommendations on events and activities in the field of home improvement and design; production of radio and television programs and films; Production of video discs and video tapes, television programs and television videos in the field of home improvement and renovation; Video tape recording for others in the field of home improvement and renovation | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 23, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 7, 2012 | PCBD | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - DENIED | — |
| Mar 7, 2012 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 14, 2012 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2012 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 18, 2012 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 11, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 23, 2011 | PPAR | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2011 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 25, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 20, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 16, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 15, 2011 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 8, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 31, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 11, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 3, 2011 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |