Drawing for ENDURANCE EVOLUTION

USPTO serial 85305970

ENDURANCE EVOLUTION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GARTNER, JOHN M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ENDURANCE EVOLUTION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas E. Jurgensen, J.D.

Thomas E. Jurgensen, J.D. OPTIMA LAW GROUP, APC4275 Executive Square, Suite 200La Jolla, CA 92037UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Dietary and nutritional supplements and beverages, namely, bars, drinks, meal replacement shakes, supplements and powdered nutritional supplement drink mixesACTIVE—
025Clothing and sporting clothing apparel, namely, t-shirts, shirts, pants, sweatshirts, sweatpants, socks, hats and capsACTIVE—
038Providing an on-line forum for coaches and athletes to discuss sports and fitnessACTIVE—
041Online website featuring non-downloadable publications in the nature of articles and journals, namely, blogs written by elite coaches and athletes both featuring sports and fitnessACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 3, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 4, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 4, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 31, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 27, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 27, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 27, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 31, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 6, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 6, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 16, 2011NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 3, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 3, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 25, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 6, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 29, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 29, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 29, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 15, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 15, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 15, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 8, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 2, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 30, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance