USPTO serial 85306199
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LIMITED
Maharashtra, IN
TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LIMITED
Maharashtra, IN
TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LIMITED
Maharashtra, IN
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William M. Borchard
William M. Borchard COWAN, LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN, P.C.114 West 47th Street, 21st FloorNEW YORK, NY 10036-1525UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Software programs and data processing programmes in printed form; Printed computer program manuals, pamphlets, brochures, books, booklets, [ recognition certificates, ] score cards, leaflets, flyers, informational sheets and newsletters, adhesive backed stickers, and kits comprising one or more of the foregoing materials in the field of integrated information and communication technology solution software for small and medium businesses in manufacturing, wellness, education, retail, restaurant, textile and professional services industries; [ paper; ] blank paper tapes and cards for the recording of computer programs; [ index cards; Blank or partially printed paper labels; ] stationery; calendars, diaries | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Business development services and business development consulting; Commercial, industrial, and business management services and consulting related thereto; Computer software-aided business management services; Business management consulting with relation to strategy, marketing, sales, operation, product design particularly specializing in the use of analytic and statistic models for the understanding and predicting of consumers, businesses, and market trends and actions; Management and operation assistance to commercial businesses; Business process outsourcing services in the manufacturing, wellness, education, retail, restaurant, textile and professional services industries; [ personal recruitment and management; public relations; secretarial service; ] Compilation and systemization of information into computer database; computerized file management | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 4, 2026 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 23, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2022 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2022 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 18, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 20, 2022 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2021 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 8, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 18, 2015 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 2, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 27, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 22, 2015 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2015 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 7, 2015 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 26, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 22, 2014 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 4, 2014 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 17, 2014 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 29, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 29, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 28, 2014 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 9, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2013 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 1, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 28, 2013 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 8, 2013 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 5, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 21, 2013 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2013 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2012 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 18, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 18, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 18, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 27, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 27, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 28, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |