USPTO serial 85306948
MICROPERFORATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FROMM, MARTHA L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MICROPERFORATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Briarcliff Manor, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sherry Flax
SHERRY FLAX SAUL EWING500 E PRATT STREETSUITE 900BALTIMORE, MD 21202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Dental and medical drill bits for cutting teeth or bone; Dental instruments, namely, dental root files used in root canal therapy procedures; Dental instruments, namely, root canal therapy instruments used to shave the inside of a root canal; Drilling jigs for surgical and dental applications; Drills for dental applications; Drills for dental use; Orthodontic appliances; Orthodontic brackets; Orthodontic machines and instruments; Surgical apparatus and instruments for medical, dental or veterinary use | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Dental services, namely, performing restorative and cosmetic procedures; Oral surgery and dental implant services; Orthodontic services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2013 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 15, 2013 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 15, 2013 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 29, 2013 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 17, 2012 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2012 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2012 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 31, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 26, 2012 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2012 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2012 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 17, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 27, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 27, 2012 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 6, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 6, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 5, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 29, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 19, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 16, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 4, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |