USPTO serial 85307091
RR RECON READY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FAHRENKOPF, PAUL
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RR RECON READY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
D. Peter Hochberg
D. PETER HOCHBERG D. PETER HOCHBERG CO., L.P.A.1940 E 6TH ST FL 6CLEVELAND, OH 44114-2225UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | sports helmets, motorcycle helmets, bicycle helmets, military helmets, police helmets, firefighter helmets, Formula 1 helmets, car racing helmets, go-cart helmets, safety helmets, sunglasses, prescription glasses, prescription-free glasses, computer gaming glasses, eyeglasses, contact lenses, sports glasses, shooting glasses, hunting glasses, 3D glasses, safety glasses, protective glasses, sailing glasses, ski goggles, night vision goggles, military goggles, sports goggles, swimming goggles, kite boarding goggles, windsurfing goggles, water sports goggles, parachuting goggles, paragliding goggles, base jumping goggles, motocross goggles, mountain bike goggles, snowmobiling goggles, snowboarding goggles, computer gaming goggles, helicopter pilot goggles, airplane pilot goggles, bobsleigh goggles, luge goggles, safety goggles, protection goggles, shooting goggles, hunting goggles, wake boarding goggles, surfing goggles, waterskiing goggles, mountain climbing goggles, face masks for diving; gas masks, inertial navigation systems; micro electro mechanical systems (MEMS), namely, small electro-mechanical devices comprising microsensors for sensing attitude, position, movement, velocity, angle, orientation and gravitational forces; dive computer systems; head mounted displays (HMD), HMD systems comprising HMD and built-in or external hardware for generating data to be displayed on HMD; heads up displays (HUD), HUD systems comprising HUD and built-in or external hardware for generating data to be displayed on HUD; underwater navigation systems comprising inertial sensors for generating and delivering location information to underwater divers; underwater communication systems comprising short range wireless transmitters and receivers for sending data between underwater divers; remote control devices for operating HMD via wireless communication; sports performance tracking systems; software applications, namely, desktop and web applications for displaying and overlaying on maps data downloaded from HMD, HMD systems, HUD, HUD systems or inertial navigation systems and for processing, filtering, sharing or manipulating such data; mobile phone applications for adding functionalities to HMD, HMD systems, HUD, HUD systems or inertial navigation systems and for storing and displaying data from HMD, HMD systems, HUD, HUD systems or inertial navigation systems; computer software platforms for developing desktop, web and mobile phone applications for use in association with HMD, HMD systems, HUD, HUD systems or inertial navigation systems; hands-free control systems comprising electronic sensors coupled to HMD for detecting a user's head and body movement or gestures and generating output signals for controlling the HMD; power management systems comprising electronic sensors coupled to HMD for managing power usage by the HMD; jump detection algorithms, computer gaming systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | services in the field of delivering data, software applications, computer games, or audiovisual content to mobile phones and mobile electronic devices | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | providing customized content and content of others automatically selected and customized based on the known or estimated geographical location of an Internet, GPS device, mobile telephone or other wired or wireless digital network based customer | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 16, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 14, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 16, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 25, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 24, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 24, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 2, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 30, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 19, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 22, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 22, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 4, 2011 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |