Drawing for MY PAIN. MY PLAN.

USPTO serial 85307409

MY PAIN. MY PLAN.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAYES, LAURIE ANN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MY PAIN. MY PLAN.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cheryl L. Foytlin

CHERYL L. FOYTLIN JOHNSON & JOHNSON1 JOHNSON AND JOHNSON PLZNEW BRUNSWICK, NJ 08933-0002UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Publications, namely, printed materials in the nature of questionnaires, guidebooks, supplemental guides, and personally tailored guides, all in the fields of pain, pain management and pain preventionACTIVE—
035Collection and systemization of health, lifestyle, and personal information into computer databases for othersACTIVE—
041Providing online questionnaires, guidebooks, and supplemental guides, all in the fields of pain, pain management and pain prevention; providing online tailored follow-up materials, namely, personally tailored online guides all in the fields of pain, pain management and pain prevention; creation of personal guides in the nature of providing educational displays in the fields of personal wellness, preventative health care, disease management and behavior change in relation to improving health and wellness via a global computer network for use by individuals in managing these wellness and health issuesACTIVE—
044Providing health and medical information in the fields of pain, pain management and pain prevention via electronic mailACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 9, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 9, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 2, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 30, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 30, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 30, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 6, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 11, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 11, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 22, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 9, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 7, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 25, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 25, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 25, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 25, 2012ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 27, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 27, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 20, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 20, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 20, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 20, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 11, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 10, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 3, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 3, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 2, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance