USPTO serial 85308037
MYGRC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COWARD, KATHRYN E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MYGRC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tim Baker
TIM BAKER SMUGLERS LLP480 LISGAR STOTTAWA, K1R5H3CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | (Based on Intent to Use) Computer software for governance, risk and compliance management (Based on 44(d) Priority Application) Computer software for governance, risk and compliance management | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | (Based on Intent to Use) Computer software design(Based on 44(d) Priority Application) Computer software design | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 16, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 6, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 16, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 16, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 16, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 16, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 11, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 5, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |