USPTO serial 85308297
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Drew H. Sherman
DREW H. SHERMAN SHERMAN LAW CORP15760 VENTURA BLVD FL 7ENCINO, CA 91436-3016UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Annin tofu; Buttercream icing; Cake icing; Caramel topping for ice cream; Chocolate food beverages not being dairy-based or vegetable based; Coconut-based fruit ice; Cones for ice cream; Dessert mousse; Dessert puddings; Dessert souffles; Dough-enrobed foods consisting of a dough-based wrapper with fillings consisting primarily of ice cream and other dairy-based desserts; Edible fruit ices; Edible ices; Egg- and dairy-free mayonnaise; Flavored ices; Frozen cashew-based desserts; Frozen confections, namely, ices; Frozen dessert consisting of fruit and cream or cream substitutes; Frozen desserts consisting of flavored ice blocks with toppings; Frozen soy-based desserts; Frozen yoghurt; Fruit ice; Fruit ice bar; Fruit ices; Ice candies; Ice cream; Ice cream desserts; Ice cream drinks; Ice cream floats; Ice cream mixes; Ice cream powder; Ice cream sandwiches; Ice cream substitute; Ice creams; Ice milk; Ice milk bars; Ice-cream; Ice-cream cakes; Iced cakes; Iced coffee; Iced tea; Ices and ice creams; Icing; Icing mixes; Icing sugar; Instant dessert puddings; Italian ice; Maize-based pudding dessert (mazamorra morada); Non-dairy frozen confections; Non-fat, low-carbohydrate, high-protein dairy-based mix for making desserts, namely, Ice Cream; Pastry cream; Pre-processed mixes for making non-dairy frozen confections; Puddings; Puddings for use as desserts; Rice-based pudding dessert; Rice-based pudding dessert (arroz con leche); Shaved ice confections; Soy-based ice cream substitute; Starch-based binding agents for ice cream; Starch-based thickeners for whipped cream | PARTIALLY PAID | — |
| 043 | ice cream parlors, ice cream parlor services, ice cream store, ice cream store services, ice cream parlor franchise | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 23, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 12, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2011 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Aug 10, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 2011 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Jun 3, 2011 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |