USPTO serial 85308317
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert G. Lancaster
Robert G. Lancaster Bryan Cave LLP211 North Broadway Suite 3600Saint Louis, MO 63102UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Annin tofu; Buttercream icing; Cake icing; Caramel topping for ice cream; Chocolate food beverages not being dairy-based or vegetable based; Coconut-based fruit ice; Cones for ice cream; Dessert mousse; Dessert puddings; Dessert souffles; Dough-enrobed foods consisting of a dough-based wrapper with fillings consisting primarily of ice cream and other dairy-based desserts; Edible fruit ices; Edible ices; Egg- and dairy-free mayonnaise; Flavored ices; Frozen cashew-based desserts; Frozen confections, namely, ices; Frozen dessert consisting of fruit and cream or cream substitutes; Frozen desserts consisting of flavored ice blocks with toppings; Frozen soy-based desserts; Frozen yoghurt; Fruit ice; Fruit ice bar; Fruit ices; Ice candies; Ice cream; Ice cream desserts; Ice cream drinks; Ice cream floats; Ice cream mixes; Ice cream powder; Ice cream sandwiches; Ice cream substitute; Ice creams; Ice milk; Ice milk bars; Ice-cream; Ice-cream cakes; Iced cakes; Iced coffee; Iced tea; Ices and ice creams; Icing; Icing mixes; Icing sugar; Instant dessert puddings; Italian ice; Maize-based pudding dessert (mazamorra morada); Non-dairy frozen confections; Non-fat, low-carbohydrate, high-protein dairy-based mix for making desserts, namely, Ice Cream; Pastry cream; Pre-processed mixes for making non-dairy frozen confections; Puddings; Puddings for use as desserts; Rice-based pudding dessert; Rice-based pudding dessert (arroz con leche); Shaved ice confections; Soy-based ice cream substitute; Starch-based binding agents for ice cream; Starch-based thickeners for whipped cream; Vegan cakes; Vegan cheesecake; Vegan cookies; Vegan cup cakes; Vegan pies | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 25, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 21, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 17, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 16, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 16, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 14, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 27, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 7, 2011 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 21, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 31, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 31, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 31, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 12, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2011 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Aug 10, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 2011 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Jun 3, 2011 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Jun 3, 2011 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Jun 3, 2011 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2011 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2011 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |