Drawing for DREAM CREAMERY

USPTO serial 85308317

DREAM CREAMERY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARLSON, KRISTIN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DREAM CREAMERY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert G. Lancaster

Robert G. Lancaster Bryan Cave LLP211 North Broadway Suite 3600Saint Louis, MO 63102UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Annin tofu; Buttercream icing; Cake icing; Caramel topping for ice cream; Chocolate food beverages not being dairy-based or vegetable based; Coconut-based fruit ice; Cones for ice cream; Dessert mousse; Dessert puddings; Dessert souffles; Dough-enrobed foods consisting of a dough-based wrapper with fillings consisting primarily of ice cream and other dairy-based desserts; Edible fruit ices; Edible ices; Egg- and dairy-free mayonnaise; Flavored ices; Frozen cashew-based desserts; Frozen confections, namely, ices; Frozen dessert consisting of fruit and cream or cream substitutes; Frozen desserts consisting of flavored ice blocks with toppings; Frozen soy-based desserts; Frozen yoghurt; Fruit ice; Fruit ice bar; Fruit ices; Ice candies; Ice cream; Ice cream desserts; Ice cream drinks; Ice cream floats; Ice cream mixes; Ice cream powder; Ice cream sandwiches; Ice cream substitute; Ice creams; Ice milk; Ice milk bars; Ice-cream; Ice-cream cakes; Iced cakes; Iced coffee; Iced tea; Ices and ice creams; Icing; Icing mixes; Icing sugar; Instant dessert puddings; Italian ice; Maize-based pudding dessert (mazamorra morada); Non-dairy frozen confections; Non-fat, low-carbohydrate, high-protein dairy-based mix for making desserts, namely, Ice Cream; Pastry cream; Pre-processed mixes for making non-dairy frozen confections; Puddings; Puddings for use as desserts; Rice-based pudding dessert; Rice-based pudding dessert (arroz con leche); Shaved ice confections; Soy-based ice cream substitute; Starch-based binding agents for ice cream; Starch-based thickeners for whipped cream; Vegan cakes; Vegan cheesecake; Vegan cookies; Vegan cup cakes; Vegan piesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 25, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 25, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 21, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Aug 17, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 17, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 17, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 16, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 16, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 14, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 14, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 21, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 27, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 27, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 7, 2011NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 22, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 21, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 31, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 31, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 31, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 31, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 31, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 31, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 27, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 27, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 12, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 12, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 12, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 12, 2011RFTPREMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS—
Aug 10, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 3, 2011TAEATEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED—
Jun 3, 2011TAEATEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED—
Jun 3, 2011TAEATEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED—
Jun 3, 2011PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Jun 3, 2011PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Jun 3, 2011PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
May 4, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 3, 2011NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance