USPTO serial 85308364
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert G. Lancaster
ROBERT G LANCASTER BRYAN CAVE LLP120 BROADWAY SUITE 300SANTA MONICA, CA 90401-2386UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Annin tofu; Buttercream icing; Cake icing; Caramel topping for ice cream; Chocolate food beverages not being dairy-based or vegetable based; Coconut-based fruit ice; Cones for ice cream; Dessert mousse; Dessert puddings; Dessert souffles; Dough-enrobed foods consisting of a dough-based wrapper with fillings consisting primarily of ice cream and other dairy-based desserts; Edible fruit ices; Edible ices; Egg- and dairy-free mayonnaise; Flavored ices; Frozen cashew-based desserts; Frozen confectionery; Frozen confections; Frozen confections, namely, freezer bars; Frozen confections, namely, freezer pops; Frozen confections, namely, ices; Frozen cookie dough; Frozen cookie, brownie and biscotti dough; Frozen custards; Frozen dessert consisting of fruit and cream or cream substitutes; Frozen desserts consisting of flavored ice blocks with toppings; Frozen dough for use as pizza, bread or other bread-type products; Frozen flavoured waters; Frozen flour-free foods, namely, pancakes, crepes, sandwich wraps, muffins and griddle cake sandwiches which are protein-enriched; Frozen flour-free foods, namely, waffles, pancakes, crepes, sandwich wraps, muffins and griddle cake sandwiches which are protein-enriched; Frozen foods, namely, grain and bread based appetizers, hors d'oeuvres, and canapés; Frozen juice bars; Frozen pie crusts; Frozen soy-based desserts; Frozen yoghurt; Frozen yogurt; Frozen yogurt confections; Frozen yogurt mixes; Frozen yogurt pies and cakes; Fruit ice; Fruit ice bar; Fruit ices; Ice candies; Ice cream; Ice cream desserts; Ice cream drinks; Ice cream floats; Ice cream mixes; Ice cream powder; Ice cream sandwiches; Ice cream substitute; Ice creams; Ice milk; Ice milk bars; Ice-cream; Ice-cream cakes; Iced cakes; Iced coffee; Iced tea; Ices and ice creams; Icing; Icing mixes; Icing sugar; Instant dessert puddings; Italian ice; Maize-based pudding dessert (mazamorra morada); Non-dairy frozen confections; Non-fat, low-carbohydrate, high-protein dairy-based mix for making desserts, namely, Ice Cream; Pastry cream; Pre-processed mixes for making non-dairy frozen confections; Puddings; Puddings for use as desserts; Rice-based pudding dessert; Rice-based pudding dessert (arroz con leche); Shaved ice confections; Soy-based ice cream substitute; Starch-based binding agents for ice cream; Starch-based thickeners for whipped cream; Vegan cakes; Vegan cheesecake; Vegan cookies; Vegan cup cakes; Vegan pies | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 7, 2014 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 7, 2014 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 7, 2014 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 7, 2014 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 16, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 16, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 14, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2012 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 24, 2012 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 21, 2011 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 3, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 8, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 8, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 7, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 12, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2011 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Aug 10, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 2011 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Jun 3, 2011 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2011 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |