USPTO serial 85308431
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Drew H. Sherman
DREW H. SHERMAN SHERMAN LAW CORP15760 VENTURA BLVD FL 7ENCINO, CA 91436-3016UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Non-dairy annin tofu; Non-dairy buttercream substitute icing; Non-dairy cake icing; Non-dairy caramel topping for ice cream; Chocolate food beverages not being dairy-based or vegetable based; Non-dairy coconut-based fruit ice; Non-dairy cones for ice cream; Non-dairy dessert mousse; Non-dairy dessert puddings; Non-dairy dessert souffles; Non-dairy edible fruit ices; Non-dairy edible ices; Egg- and dairy-free mayonnaise; Non-dairy flavored ices; Non-dairy frozen cashew-based desserts; Non-dairy frozen confectionery; Non-dairy frozen confections; Non-dairy frozen confections, namely, freezer bars; Non-dairy frozen confections, namely, freezer pops; Non-dairy frozen confections, namely, ices; Non-dairy frozen cookie dough; Non-dairy frozen cookie, brownie and biscotti dough; Non-dairy frozen custards; Non-dairy frozen dessert consisting of fruit and cream substitutes; Non-dairy frozen desserts consisting of flavored ice blocks with toppings; Non-dairy frozen dough for use as pizza, bread or other bread-type products; Non-dairy frozen flavored waters; Non-dairy frozen flour-free foods, namely, pancakes, crepes, sandwich wraps, muffins and griddle cake sandwiches which are protein-enriched; Non-dairy frozen flour-free foods, namely, waffles, pancakes, crepes, sandwich wraps, muffins and griddle cake sandwiches which are protein-enriched; Non-dairy frozen foods, namely, grain and bread based appetizers, hors d'oeuvres, and canapés; Non-dairy frozen juice bars; Non-dairy frozen pie crusts; Frozen soy-based desserts; Non-dairy frozen yoghurt substitute; Non-dairy frozen yogurt substitute; Non-dairy frozen yogurt substitute confections; Non-dairy frozen yogurt substitute mixes; Non-dairy frozen yogurt substitute pies and cakes; Non-dairy fruit ice; Non-dairy fruit ice bar; Non-dairy fruit ices; Non-dairy ice candies; Non-dairy ice cream substitute; Non-dairy ice cream substitute desserts; Non-dairy ice cream substitute drinks; Non-dairy ice cream substitute floats; Non-dairy ice cream substitute mixes; Non-dairy ice cream substitute powder; Non-dairy ice cream substitute sandwiches; Non-dairy ice creams substitute; Non-dairy ice milk substitute; Non-dairy ice milk substitute bars; Non-dairy ice-cream substitute cakes; Non-dairy iced cakes; Non-dairy iced coffee; Non-dairy iced tea; Non-dairy ices and ice cream substitute; Non-dairy icing; Non-dairy icing mixes; Non-dairy icing sugar; Non-dairy instant dessert puddings; Non-dairy Italian ice; Non-dairy maize-based pudding dessert (mazamorra morada); Non-dairy frozen confections; Non-dairy pastry cream substitute; Pre-processed mixes for making non-dairy frozen confections; Non-dairy puddings; Non-dairy puddings for use as desserts; Non-dairy rice-based pudding dessert; Non-dairy rice-based pudding dessert (arroz con leche); Non-dairy shaved ice confections; Soy-based ice cream substitute; Non-dairy starch-based binding agents for ice cream substitute; Non-dairy starch-based thickeners for whipped cream substitute; Vegan cakes; Vegan cheesecake; Vegan cookies; Vegan cup cakes; Vegan pies | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 22, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 28, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2014 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 19, 2014 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 15, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2013 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 5, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 22, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2013 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 21, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 21, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 17, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 21, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 27, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 7, 2011 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 21, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 31, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 31, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 31, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 12, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2011 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Aug 10, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 2011 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Jun 3, 2011 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2011 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |