USPTO serial 85308707
BOBSLED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FLETCHER, TRACY L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BOBSLED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard W. Hansen
Richard W. Hansen T-Mobile USA, Inc.12920 S.E. 38th StreetBellevue, WA 98006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable software that enables the creation, transmission and receipt of text messages, e-mails, instant messages, multimedia messages, and IP-based audio and video communications among fixed and mobile devices connected to cellular or IP-based networks, namely, computers, smartphones, mobile phones, landline phones, VoIP phones, e-reader devices, gaming devices, game consoles, portable media players, cameras, digital video recorders, GPS units and televisions; downloadable software that synchronizes text messages, e-mails, multimedia messages and address book information among computers, smartphones, mobile phones, landline phones, VoIP phones, e-reader devices, gaming devices, game consoles, portable media players, cameras, digital video recorders, GPS units, televisions and cloud-based databases | ABANDONED | — |
| 038 | Communications services, namely, electronic transmission of text messages, e-mails, instant messages, multimedia messages, and IP-based audio and video communications among fixed and mobile devices connected to cellular or IP-based networks, namely, computers, smartphones, mobile phones, landline phones, VoIP phones, e-reader devices, gaming devices, game consoles, portable media players, cameras, digital video recorders, GPS units and televisions; VoIP services; video chat services; instant messaging services; text and multimedia messaging services; e-mail services; providing databases consisting of text messages, e-mails, multimedia messages and address book information among fixed and mobile devices connected to cellular or IP-based networks, namely, computers, smartphones, mobile phones, landline phones, VoIP phones, e-reader devices, gaming devices, game consoles, portable media players, cameras, digital video recorders, GPS units and televisions | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | Providing temporary use of online, non-downloadable software that allows users to create, transmit and receive text messages, e-mails, instant messages, multimedia messages, and IP-based audio and video communications among fixed and mobile devices connected to cellular or IP-based networks, namely, computers, smartphones, mobile phones, landline phones, VoIP phones, e-reader devices, gaming devices, game consoles, portable media players, cameras, digital video recorders, GPS units and televisions; ASP services in the nature of hosting, maintaining and synchronizing databases consisting of text messages, e-mails, multimedia messages and address book information among fixed and mobile devices connected to cellular or IP-based networks, namely, computers, smartphones, mobile phones, landline phones, VoIP phones, e-reader devices, gaming devices, game consoles, portable media players, cameras, digital video recorders, GPS units and televisions | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2013 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 1, 2013 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 28, 2013 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2013 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 26, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 28, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 28, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 13, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 1, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 29, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 9, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 7, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 7, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 8, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 13, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 8, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 8, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 8, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 5, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2011 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 18, 2011 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 1, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 1, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 29, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 27, 2011 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 27, 2011 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 27, 2011 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 25, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 5, 2011 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |