USPTO serial 85308952
MICHAEL TIRANNO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUBOIS, SUSAN L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MICHAEL TIRANNO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sharon R. Gold
SHARON R. GOLD TROYGOULD PC1801 CENTURY PARK E STE 1600LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-2367UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Motion picture films featuring comedy, drama, action, adventure and/or animation; prerecorded CDs, video tapes, laser disks and DVDs featuring motion picture films and entertainment programs featuring comedy, drama, action, adventure and/or animation; computer game software used and played on console gaming devices, personal computers, mobile and cellular telephones, handheld computers and personal digital assistants | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Series of fiction books; children's books; comic books; general feature magazines; note cards; greeting cards; trading cards; lithographs; novels; books in the field of animation and fantasy; pens; pencils; posters; photographs; book covers; book marks; calendars | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by King Midas World Entertainment, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by King Midas World Entertainment, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named MICHAEL TIRANNO
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 13, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 10, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2013 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 6, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2013 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Sep 5, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 5, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 15, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 12, 2013 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 26, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 2, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2013 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 1, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 1, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 14, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 12, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 17, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 28, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 9, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 22, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 10, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 10, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 11, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 6, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |