USPTO serial 85309153
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2015 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Sep 4, 2015 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 28, 2015 | ERRS | TEAS REQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT | — |
| Jun 29, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 29, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 2, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2015 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2015 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2015 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 3, 2015 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2015 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 5, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 1, 2014 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2014 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 30, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2014 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 30, 2014 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 30, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2014 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2014 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2014 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 7, 2014 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2013 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 18, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2013 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2013 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2013 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2013 | ERTP | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2013 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2013 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 30, 2013 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2013 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jul 30, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 30, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 1, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 29, 2013 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 30, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 29, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 29, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 3, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 14, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 29, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 27, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 9, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 9, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 17, 2011 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 17, 2011 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 17, 2011 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 11, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 9, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |