USPTO serial 85309777
BURLESQUE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EDWARDS, ALICIA COLLINS
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BURLESQUE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Pongo Pty Ltd as Trustee for Freerun Trust
Mount Barker, WA, AU
Other trademarks owned by Pongo Pty Ltd as Trustee for Freerun Trust
Jurien Enterprises Pty Ltd as Trustee for Nicholas W. Stacy Trust
South Perth, WA, AU
Other trademarks owned by Jurien Enterprises Pty Ltd as Trustee for Nicholas W. Stacy Trust
Allday Enterprises Pty Ltd as Trustee for Rob Quenby Trust
Kojonup, WA, AU
Other trademarks owned by Allday Enterprises Pty Ltd as Trustee for Rob Quenby Trust
Castleroy Holdings Pty Ltd as Trustee for No 4 Investment Trust
East Perth, WA, AU
Other trademarks owned by Castleroy Holdings Pty Ltd as Trustee for No 4 Investment Trust
Castleroy Holdings Pty Ltd as Trustee for No 5 Investment Trust
East Perth, WA, AU
Other trademarks owned by Castleroy Holdings Pty Ltd as Trustee for No 5 Investment Trust
Kerrigan Holdings Pty Ltd as Trustee for Pavlinovich Family
South Perth, WA, AU
Other trademarks owned by Kerrigan Holdings Pty Ltd as Trustee for Pavlinovich Family
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Philip R. Zender
Philip R. Zender Squire Sanders (US) LLP275 Battery Street, Suite 2600San Francisco, CA 94111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | dry sparkling wines; sparkling wines; sweet sparkling wine; wine; liqueurs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Pongo Pty Ltd as Trustee for Freerun Trust
- Other trademarks owned by Jurien Enterprises Pty Ltd as Trustee for Nicholas W. Stacy Trust
- Other trademarks owned by Allday Enterprises Pty Ltd as Trustee for Rob Quenby Trust
- Other trademarks owned by Castleroy Holdings Pty Ltd as Trustee for No 4 Investment Trust
- Other trademarks owned by Castleroy Holdings Pty Ltd as Trustee for No 5 Investment Trust
- Other trademarks owned by Kerrigan Holdings Pty Ltd as Trustee for Pavlinovich Family
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named BURLESQUE
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 8, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 1, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 1, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 14, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 15, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 5, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |