USPTO serial 85310228
NEUSHIELD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NEUSHIELD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter J. Riebling
PETER J. RIEBLING KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN LLP2900 K Street, N.W.North Tower, Suite 200WASHINGTON, DC 20007-5119Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware devices for analyzing, monitoring, intercepting, capturing, logging, testing, troubleshooting, securing, and protecting computer networks, network systems, network data, network information, network performance, data packets, and internet protocol traffic, and for generating related reports and event notification alerts; computer hardware devices for on-line scanning, testing, intercepting, capturing, quarantining and eliminating viruses, worms, trojans, spyware, adware, malware and unauthorized data and programs on computer networks, network systems, network data, network information, network performance, data packets, and internet protocol traffic, and for providing related reports and event notification alerts | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technical support services, namely, 24x7 monitoring of network systems, servers and web and database applications and notification of related events and alerts; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting in the nature of diagnosing computer hardware and software problems involving computer networks, network systems, network data, network information, network performance, data packets; computer security consultancy in the field of scanning and penetration testing of computers and networks to assess information security vulnerability; computer security consultation in the field of computer networks, network systems, network data, network information, network performance, data packets, and internet protocol traffic, and providing related reports and event notification alerts; computer services, namely, on-line scanning and testing for viruses, worms, trojans, spyware, adware, malware and unauthorized data and programs on computer networks, network systems, network data, network information, network performance, data packets, and internet protocol traffic, and providing related reports and event notification alerts; computer services, namely, monitoring, testing, analyzing, and reporting on the Internet traffic control and content control of the web sites of others | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Monitoring of computer networks, network systems, network data, network information, network performance, data packets, and internet protocol traffic for security purposes, and providing related reports and event notification alerts; analyzing data in computer databases and networks for criminal activity; computerized security services, namely, electronically monitoring, detecting and reporting on suspicious and abnormal patterns of network and system activity which typically indicate problems such as security failures, theft, wrongdoing, training issues, or customer service issues; security services, namely, providing security assessments of computer networks and network systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Neustar, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Neustar, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named NEUSHIELD
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 23, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 5, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 21, 2013 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 23, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 21, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 21, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 27, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 7, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 22, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 21, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 31, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 31, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 14, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 13, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 11, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 12, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 6, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |