USPTO serial 85310419
DURA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORDOVA, RAUL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DURA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brett M. Tolpin
BRETT M. TOLPIN Tolpin & Partners PC100 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 510Chicago, IL 60602UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | Geosynthetic fabric and four-sided interlocking shiplap polystyrene foam insulating panels used to eliminate and reduce ground disturbance during freeze and thaw cycles and to add sub-surface insulation; Transferable and mobile self contained spray pump system for use in all weather climates used to heat and distribute environmentally friendly oils that act as a liner to prevent materials from sticking to surfaces; Engineering services, namely, installation of geosynthetic fabric and four-sided interlocking shiplap polystyrene foam insulating panels; Engineering services, namely, distribution of environmentally friendly oils using a transferable and mobile self contained spray pump system | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2014 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Sep 29, 2014 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2014 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 4, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 29, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 15, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 28, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 26, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 26, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 19, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 17, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 16, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 21, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 28, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |