USPTO serial 85313681
FREEBIRD BY STEVEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELLO, ZACK
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FREEBIRD BY STEVEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Long Island City, NY
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Shoes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2014 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 14, 2014 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 14, 2014 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 29, 2013 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 5, 2013 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Feb 8, 2013 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2013 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2013 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 11, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 5, 2012 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2012 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2012 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 18, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 7, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 7, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 7, 2012 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 10, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 10, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 18, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 19, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 12, 2011 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |