USPTO serial 85320517
CPP CERTIFIED PAYMENTS PROFESSIONAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, YATSYE ISADORA
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CPP CERTIFIED PAYMENTS PROFESSIONAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathan M. Holda, Esq.
JONATHAN M HOLDA ESQ OBER KALER GRIMES SHRIVER A PROFESS100 LIGHT STREETBALTIMORE, MD 21202 1036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Educational services, namely, providing, arranging and conducting educational conferences, courses, meetings, seminars, testing, training courses, classes, workshops and symposia in the field of electronic payments processing for merchants and distribution of educational materials and training information in connection therewith | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | Accreditation services, namely, developing and administering standards and procedures for certifying professionals in the field of electronic payments processing for merchants; testing, analysis, and evaluation of the knowledge, skills and abilities of others for the purpose of certification and re-certification in the field of electronic payments processing for merchants | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Electronic Transactions Association
- Other trademarks owned by Electronic Transactions Association
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CPP CERTIFIED PAYMENTS PROFESSIONAL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 2013 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 9, 2013 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 9, 2013 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 9, 2013 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 27, 2012 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 25, 2012 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 7, 2011 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 21, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 31, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 28, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 30, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 19, 2011 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2011 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |